Who invented the kettle wikipedia

Reading for comprehension isn't your strong point? This was clear, concise, and not an "obfuscating word game" at all. At least, not if you put forth an honest attempt to understand. If the universe were infinite in size, it's the same size in each direction, yet has no center point, since each point, no matter how far away from another defined point, is just as far from each infinite extent as any other.

While I agree Wow, I think Andrew's mistake is a pretty common one and so worth explaining in simple terms. So here's my attempt. Most laypeople are familiar with the 'expanding balloon' analogy if not, look it up, then come back here for the rest.

The important, hard-to-grasp point that laypeople need to remember about the balloon analogy is that the universe is represented by the surface of the balloon, not its interior space. The 'interior space' of the balloon would not be in our universe or be a part of our universe.

Now as a balloon shrinks and grows, you look at the surface, and you see that there is never a center on that surface. And that is why to the best of the analogy's ability to represent complicated physics we say there is on center or origin point.

The key point, or one of them, is that according to General Relativity which so far has been confirmed by everything from planet precessions to GPS calculations to gravitational waves , our universe has no edges.

You could travel forever and never hit a wall. If the speed of light were much faster than it is, you could theoretical arrive back at your starting point eventually by traveling at the speed of light in any direction away from that starting point, but the universe is too big and expanding too fast relative to c to allow that. Without edges, there is no way to define a center - at least I can't think of one.

One could make a mathematical model that embeds a boundaryless shape in higher dimensions so that the extra dimensions provide boundaries, but unless and until there is a way to get access measurements, evidence to those higher dimensions that would be just speculation.

I also can't see anything without an edge - I can't see emptiness nothing to see there, better move on so it is impossible for me to visualize the shape of our universe.

Anyway, GR is the best model we have, and its assumption is that this universe has no edges and therefore no unique center. Philosophically, that makes some sense to me.

The universe is all there is, and how can all there is have boundaries? Not that the universe cares what my philosophy says. It's where the air goes in! In terms of topology, they're actually plates in the same way donuts and cups with handles are the same topological shape!

Meanwhile, a visualization of sorts just occurred to me. I visualize an infinite volume of nothingness - since it contains nothing it might as well be infinite. Within that volume, random specks of something occur, with the following rules: something includes what we think of as normal space which is not nothing, it has vacuum energy ; something that is moving within something can travel through nothing instantaneously to the next patch of something; and the patches of something are increasing over time.

This is similar to higher-dimension embedment, using the "nothing" instead of a higher dimension, and is just another analogy so there is probably something wrong with it, but until I find out what I will use it. If it weren't for the fact that you have soundly established yourself as an effectively thought-free troll whose interest lies solely in latching onto individual words out of some weird obsession with trying to get people to appreciate your pratfalls, you would have understood that all you have done is demonstrate that you don't understand the basic point.

But you're willing to try to leverage this for attention-whoring, of course. It's a pretty crappy stock-in-trade, if you ask me, but you're the one who has to stew in a self-made kettle of "chastity" heh , misogyny, racism, hypocrisy, and comfortable, rank ignorance. Not to be confused with Flubromazepam, which is much less potent and has a much longer half-life.

While even in the Netherlands, Research Chemicals are considered a grey-area-market and even vendors who registered companies or actually mostly fronts for their web shops try to stay anonymous because they are afraid of angry mothers whose kids they have poisoned with synthetic designer drugs, in the US, to my best knowledge, only criminals sell Research Chemicals. Close work with legal Clonazolam suppliers guarantees notable results of your tests and researches.

Kan zijn Exemples. A categorized index of first-person experiences with Clonazolam. Bevat o. Flubromazolam is a novel synthetic depressant substance of the benzodiazepine class which produces anxiolytic, disinhibiting, sedative, muscle relaxant, and memory suppressing effects when administered. Etizolam 2. New client-principal client, Hello! Thank you for taking the time to read our offer of cooperation.

Featured articles. SciTech Connect. Treemap word cloud similar to this example showing the most used words in a forum about drugs. This makes LSA an excellent choice for any psychonaut, especially when considering how cost effective and widely available the natural plant sources are.

Phenazepam is used in the treatment of various mental disorders such as psychiatric schizophrenia and anxiety. Bromazolam Vendor Pyrazolam Pellets. Adinazolam marketed under the brand name Deracyn is a tranquilizer of the triazolobenzodiazepine TBZD class, which are benzodiazepines BZDs fused with a triazole ring.

Flubromazepam was first developed in the s but never made it to market anywhere in the world, and remained fairly obscure for some 50 years. Etizolam marketed under many brand names is a thienodiazepine derivative which is a benzodiazepine analog. Page 1 of 3 - RC benzos - posted in Meds: Hey mensen! Ff vermelden voor meclonazepam dat ik mn geld hier echt niet aan zou opdoen!

Waardeloos net zoals deschloro-etizolam imho. In the USA, clonazolam is an unscheduled chemical and it is being used for research purposes only. This compound was patented in by a D:. Waarschijnlijk heeft deze ook het minste abuse-potentieel, want je wordt er niet 'benzo-high' van.

To name a few, Etilaam, Etizex and Etizest have been approved and distributed as research chemical alternate version to common Benzodiazepines. Deze is vooral angstremmend, dus men wordt er niet slaperig en slapjes van. This compound was patented in by a Vaccine-driven pharmacodynamic dissection and mitigation of Captagon psychoactivity. See full list on psychonautwiki.

AMT is available in both powder and pellet form, and was developed in the s as an anti-depressant. De 2 parent molecules zijn vele malen beter en snap niet waarom ze deze nu op de rc markt brengen. We are currently equipped to offer many chemicals for your forensic or analytical research -related needs. Pyrazolam : soort kruising tussen Alprazolam en bromazepam. Popular in the research chemical scene, it is a potent sedative, hypnotic and anxiolytic.

Norflurazepam auch bspw. It is incredibly potent active in the microgram range with an unusually long 18 hour duration.

I find the RC benzos with a more normal dose-response curve are better, even the stronger ones. Designer substitutions to the 2C structure can result in altered hallucinogenic and stimulant activity. Please note this website is under new onwership based in the EU and we do not accept orders from, or ship to, the UK. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. Need to get more pyrazolam since I'm one of the few that found it worked extremely well for me, especially when taken with Etizolam.

Le collectif des junkies d'IDF , propose d'administrer des vaccins! Clonazolam is reported to be roughly 2. On the face of it, a devastatingly capable sports car with two personas. With a little self-restraint, you'd be hard pushed to tell the M4 was a dragster in disguise, soft suspension setting soaking up all but the deepest potholes and road imperfections. Here though lays the problem, experiencing the full potential just once, and you'll be sprinting from stoplight to stoplight, savoring the surge of acceleration, g-forces pushing you rearwards as a huge grin spreads across your face.

Admittedly, there is that odd, oversized double kidney grille to get past, but otherwise in every scenario the M4 is awesome. The way it goes, handles, and stops make it a contender for one of, if not the best coupe on the market today , all things to all gearheads, the M4 is stunning. BMWs first-generation M4 launched in might have been a reworked with a bit more power thrown in for good measure, but it worked and was a huge success, rivaling Mercedes-AMG's C63 S Coupe in terms of performance and refinement.

Fast-forward seven years and from a technical point of view, things have moved on. The latest M4, more powerful, more capable while every bit as engaging comes with a similar sticker price, although that's sure to rise with a few optional extras true to BMW form.

It's on the outside things haven't gone down quite so well. BMW's new, larger double-kidney grille layout deployed across the range isn't quite the look of its predecessor. The car's color is going to be a make or break for those not wanting to draw attention to themselves, we'd opt for matte black. In the yellow corner, BMW's M4 coupe packing a straight-six 3-liter turbocharged motor dishing out hp, the German carmaker claiming a top speed north of mph artificially limited , with a sprint to 60 mph in a mere 3.

In terms of everyday useable performance, anything more is surely bordering on the insane. However, any previous thoughts of how much is enough are pushed to breaking point with the M4 Competition. BMW retained the same basic engine layout with a few custom tweaks, resulting in hp shaving valuable tenths from the mph time with a similar top speed.

Fans of previous M-badged specials are in for a treat, BMW's S58B30T0 engine, even with the addition of a brace of turbos , is still up there with the very best when it comes to aural stimulation. Forced induction can often muffle an engine's induction soundtrack, not so in the case of the M4, the famous turbine-esque cacophony of noise is still present.